Food and nutrition tracking with an unusually careful database: it reports micronutrients as well as calories, using laboratory-verified data rather than user submissions.
Do not build this. The database is decades of work and it is the entire product. Micronutrients from laboratory sources, verified rather than crowd-submitted, is the difference between a food tracker that tells you something and one that tells you what a stranger typed. You cannot recreate it, and a tracker built on user submissions will confidently report a vitamin figure that is wrong. WHAT TO DO INSTEAD - Keep it if you track micronutrients. That is what it is for and nothing else does it as carefully - If you only count calories and protein, that is a much smaller problem and the free tiers of several tools cover it WHAT YOU CAN BUILD, IF YOU WANT THE DATA ON YOUR OWN MACHINE Use an open food composition database as the source — several national ones are published freely with laboratory-derived values — and build the logging around it: STACK - A PWA that works offline, SQLite on device, an optional sync server storing ciphertext WHAT TO IMPLEMENT - Import the open database once, with its version recorded, so a figure can always be traced to its source and its edition - Log a food in three seconds: search, pick a portion, done. If it takes longer it will not happen five times a day - Recent and frequent foods first, and a saved meal that logs six items at once. That is where the speed comes from - Recipes: ingredients in, nutrition per serving computed, stored as a food - Barcode scanning against an open product database, with the honest note that open product data is patchier than a commercial one and a missing barcode means typing it in - Targets per nutrient with a source cited, and never a number presented as medical advice - Write to the platform's health store so it appears alongside everything else, and read back what other applications recorded THE HONEST WARNING Nutrition figures vary by cultivar, soil, cooking method and brand. Any tracker's numbers are an estimate with a wide margin, and a tool that displays them to two decimal places is lying about its own precision. Show ranges or round generously. THE ONE-LINE VERSION The verified database is the product. Build the logging on top of an open one, and be honest about the error bars.
What you lose
- A curated nutrition database with micronutrients from laboratory sources, which is decades of work you cannot recreate
- Barcode scanning against that database, which is what makes daily logging survivable
- Recipe and serving-size handling that keeps the numbers honest
If you would rather not build
- USDA FoodData Central, free and authoritative but unbranded
- MyFitnessPal, for a larger user-contributed database
What it costs
read from their page 17 Aug 2026
| Plan | Billed monthly | Billed yearly | Last read |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | $10.99/mo | — | 17 Aug 2026 |
Their pricing page is where these came from. Seeing a different price? Tell us.
The escape hatch
open source · no votes, no paid placement
Open Food Facts
$0An open, crowd-sourced food and barcode database you can query or host.
openfoodfacts/openfoodfacts-serverfree · open source
Wger
$0Self-hosted fitness and nutrition tracking with its own food database.
wger-project/wgerfree · open source
Why this verdict
our own opinion · changed only by a person
24/100
Verdict no at 24. The logging app is easy; the database is the moat, and the open datasets do not cover branded food well enough to replace it.
History
tracked since 10 Aug 2026 · nothing is ever overwritten
Questions about Cronometer
answered from the record above
Is Cronometer free?
No — the plan we track is $10.99 a month. Gold at $10.99/month on monthly billing, or $4.99/month billed annually ($59.99/year).
Can you replace Cronometer by building your own?
KEEP IT. The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying. Replacement score 24 out of 100, build time longer than it saves. Read what you lose before you decide.
How much does Cronometer cost?
$10.99 a month on Gold — $131.88 a year. Recorded 17 Aug 2026.
What do you lose by replacing Cronometer?
A curated nutrition database with micronutrients from laboratory sources, which is decades of work you cannot recreate; Barcode scanning against that database, which is what makes daily logging survivable; Recipe and serving-size handling that keeps the numbers honest. If any of those carry weight for you, keep paying.
Is there an open-source alternative to Cronometer?
Yes: Open Food Facts, Wger. The prompt on this page is for when you want it your way instead.
Related entries
same category first, most replaced first
Every week, something stops being worth paying for.
New verdicts, prices that moved, entries added. One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. Nothing is being sent yet — your address is kept here, and the first issue is the first thing it is used for.
free forever · no tracking pixel · stored here, never passed to anyone

