Records remote interviews at full quality by capturing each participant locally rather than over the call, then uploading the tracks and aligning them into one session.
Do not build this. Takes that survive a bad connection is the product, and it is the whole engineering problem. Everybody records locally at full quality while the call runs over whatever the network manages, then the local files are uploaded and synchronised afterwards. That means capturing on each participant's machine, uploading in chunks during the call, surviving a browser crash, and aligning several tracks that started at slightly different moments on unsynchronised clocks. Getting the alignment wrong by a hundred milliseconds is audible. WHEN TO KEEP PAYING - You record interviews with guests you cannot ask to install anything - Anything published, where a guest's audio dropping out is unrecoverable WHEN TO BUILD - Solo recording, or a co-host who will run their own recorder. Then the answer is much simpler and much better: **everybody records locally with their own software and sends you the file.** Free, higher quality than any platform, and it is what professional podcasts do THE FREE VERSION THAT WORKS - Each participant records their own audio locally while the conversation happens on any meeting service - A clap or a countdown at the start gives you an alignment point that costs nothing - You assemble the tracks afterwards in an editor - The only real risk is somebody forgetting to press record, which a checklist solves IF YOU BUILD THE SYNCHRONISED VERSION - Record locally with MediaRecorder into chunks written out as they arrive, so a crash loses seconds rather than everything - Upload chunks during the call, with resume, and reconcile at the end by hash - Align on a shared timestamp exchanged at the start and refined against the drift you measure, not on wall clocks, which disagree - A visible per-participant indicator that recording is actually happening and uploading is keeping up. That indicator is where trust lives - Loudness normalisation per track to a broadcast target afterwards, which does more for the result than any editing AND THE THING THAT IMPROVES A RECORDING MOST Three ffmpeg filters — loudness normalisation, a high-pass to remove rumble, and gentle noise reduction — improve a recording more than any platform feature. That is an afternoon. THE ONE-LINE VERSION Buy it for guests. For yourself, record locally and send the files — it is free and it sounds better.
What you lose
- Local recording on every participant’s machine, uploaded progressively, so a bad connection does not ruin the take
- Separate tracks per speaker, aligned to the same clock
- Automatic reconnection and recovery when someone drops mid-session
- Transcription, clip generation and captions on the same recording
- A guest experience that works in a browser with no install and no account
If you would rather not build
- Zencastr — paid, the closest competitor for audio
What it costs
read from their page 15 Aug 2026
| Plan | Billed monthly | Billed yearly | Last read |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | $29/mo | — | 15 Aug 2026 |
Their pricing page is where these came from. Seeing a different price? Tell us.
The escape hatch
open source · no votes, no paid placement
Jitsi Meet
$0Self-hosted video conferencing with server-side recording.
jitsi/jitsi-meetfree · open source
OBS Studio
$0Local recording and streaming; the free half of this, without the remote guests.
obsproject/obs-studiofree · open source
Why this verdict
our own opinion · changed only by a person
25/100
Verdict no at 25: the recording is achievable, the alignment is where builds fail, and browser inconsistency in MediaRecorder is a permanent tax. For anyone whose income depends on the take surviving, renting this is the rational choice.
History
tracked since 9 Aug 2026 · nothing is ever overwritten
Questions about Riverside
answered from the record above
Is Riverside free?
No — the plan we track is $29 a month. Standard at $29/month billed monthly, around $19 annually; recording hours and 4K export sit on higher tiers.
Can you replace Riverside by building your own?
KEEP IT. The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying. Replacement score 25 out of 100, build time longer than it saves. Read what you lose before you decide.
How much does Riverside cost?
$29 a month on Standard — $348 a year. Recorded 9 Aug 2026.
What do you lose by replacing Riverside?
Local recording on every participant’s machine, uploaded progressively, so a bad connection does not ruin the take; Separate tracks per speaker, aligned to the same clock; Automatic reconnection and recovery when someone drops mid-session; Transcription, clip generation and captions on the same recording; A guest experience that works in a browser with no install and no account. If any of those carry weight for you, keep paying.
Is there an open-source alternative to Riverside?
Yes: Jitsi Meet, OBS Studio. The prompt on this page is for when you want it your way instead.
Related entries
same category first, most replaced first
Every week, something stops being worth paying for.
New verdicts, prices that moved, entries added. One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. Nothing is being sent yet — your address is kept here, and the first issue is the first thing it is used for.
free forever · no tracking pixel · stored here, never passed to anyone

