Unsplash+

unsplash.comcontributed by Samuele Ongaro

KEEP IT

The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying.

A photo library with a permissive free tier, where the paid tier adds an extended licence, higher-quality selections and no attribution requirement.

Promptfree, for everyone, and the only version there is
Do not build this. The licence is the product, and that is the entire point.

What you are paying for is not files — it is permission to use them, and an indemnity if that permission turns out to be wrong. A photograph of a recognisable person or a branded object needs a model or property release, and the paid tier is where those exist. Using an image without one is a risk that lands on you, years later, in a letter.

WHAT TO DO INSTEAD
- Keep it if you publish commercially and use stock photography regularly. It is cheap for what it removes
- The free tier of the same service is genuinely usable for a great deal, with its own licence terms — read them rather than assuming

WHAT TO DO REGARDLESS

**Keep an asset register.** One file listing every image, its source, its licence, the date you obtained it, and where you used it. When somebody asks — and for a business that publishes, somebody eventually does — that file is the answer. Without it you are reconstructing a decade of decisions from memory.

**Prefer assets you do not have to defend:**
- Your own photographs, which are always the most distinctive option and usually the most trusted
- Generated typographic images from your own templates, which is under Canva elsewhere in this catalogue and is faster than searching for a photograph once it exists
- Open-licensed sources, with the attribution requirement recorded per file so it is not forgotten

**And optimise whatever you use:**
- Resize to the sizes actually used, convert to AVIF or WebP with a fallback, and strip metadata
- A stock photograph shipped at four thousand pixels is the single largest waste on most sites

THE HONEST NOTE
A generic stock photograph makes a page look like every other page. The best-looking sites in most categories use their own photographs or no photographs at all, and that is a design decision rather than a budget one.

THE ONE-LINE VERSION
You are buying permission, not pixels. Keep an asset register, and consider using fewer stock photographs.

What you lose

  • A licence you can point a client at, which is the actual product on the paid tier
  • A curated collection large enough to find something usable quickly
  • Photographs, which are made by people and cost money

If you would rather not build

  • A stock subscription elsewhere
  • A photographer, for anything that matters

What it costs

as published on their pricing page

PlanBilled monthlyBilled yearlyLast read
—$12/mo——

Their pricing page is where these came from. Seeing a different price? Tell us.

The escape hatch

open source · no votes, no paid placement

Openverse

$0

A search engine for openly licensed media, with an API.

WordPress/openversefree · open source

sharp

$0

Handles the resize and convert step on import.

lovell/sharpfree · open source

Why this verdict

our own opinion · changed only by a person

20/100

Verdict no at 20. The product is a licence, not software. The useful build is recording where every image came from.

History

tracked since 10 Aug 2026 · nothing is ever overwritten

Interest · last 30 dayspeak 2/day
views01230 Aug4 Sept9 Sept14 Sept19 Sept24 Sept28 Sept
— views— prompt copies none yet— votes none yet

Questions about Unsplash+

answered from the record above

Is Unsplash+ free?

No — the plan we track is $12 a month. Around $12/month billed annually for the members tier with extended licences.

Can you replace Unsplash+ by building your own?

KEEP IT. The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying. Replacement score 20 out of 100, build time longer than it saves. Read what you lose before you decide.

How much does Unsplash+ cost?

$12 a month on Unsplash+ — $144 a year. Recorded 10 Aug 2026.

What do you lose by replacing Unsplash+?

A licence you can point a client at, which is the actual product on the paid tier; A curated collection large enough to find something usable quickly; Photographs, which are made by people and cost money. If any of those carry weight for you, keep paying.

Is there an open-source alternative to Unsplash+?

Yes: Openverse, sharp. The prompt on this page is for when you want it your way instead.

Related entries

same category first, most replaced first

All 31 in Design & website builders

Not sending yet

Every week, something stops being worth paying for.

New verdicts, prices that moved, entries added. One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. Nothing is being sent yet — your address is kept here, and the first issue is the first thing it is used for.

free forever · no tracking pixel · stored here, never passed to anyone

Esc