Zoom
The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying.
Video meetings that connect from anywhere and everybody already has installed. The paid plan lifts the time limit, adds recording to the cloud and gives an account somebody can administer.
Do not build this. Everybody already has it installed, and that is the product. A video meeting is worth nothing if the other person cannot join. The value here is that a link opens for a client, a supplier or a relative with no explanation, on whatever device they own — and that is a network position, not software. THE COST YOU WOULD TAKE ON - A large share of users sit behind networks where a direct connection cannot be made. Without relay servers their call simply fails, silently, for them - A selective forwarding server sends every participant's stream to everybody else, so a call of ten is far more than five times a call of two - Both are bandwidth, and bandwidth is a bill that scales with use WHEN TO KEEP PAYING - Meetings with people outside your organisation, which is nearly all of them WHEN TO BUILD SOMETHING - **Meetings embedded in your own product**, where the branding and the flow are yours. That is a real project and it is covered under Jitsi and Whereby elsewhere in this catalogue - Internal-only calls on a network you control, where Jitsi on one machine is genuinely enough WHAT TO DO INSTEAD, WHICH IS WORTH MORE THAN THE SUBSCRIPTION - **Check the free tier.** Forty minutes is longer than most meetings should be, and a great many paid accounts exist to avoid a limit nobody was near - **Audit the seats.** This is priced per host, and people who only ever join do not need one - **Cut the meetings.** The asynchronous standup is under Geekbot elsewhere in this catalogue, and a recorded walkthrough is under Loom. Both replace a recurring meeting outright, which saves more than any licence AND THE ONE THING TO BUILD A recording archive of your own: pull the recordings out on a schedule, transcribe them locally, index the text with FTS5, and keep them somewhere you control with a stated retention. Recordings of colleagues talking are sensitive, they accumulate quietly, and leaving them in a vendor's storage with a default retention is a decision nobody took deliberately. THE ONE-LINE VERSION Keep it, check the free tier, and audit the seats. Then spend the effort on having fewer meetings rather than cheaper ones.
What you lose
- Calls that connect on restrictive networks, which is bandwidth and relay servers rather than software
- Clients on every platform, including the ones in meeting rooms and on televisions
- A link anybody can open without explanation, which is the entire reason it spread
- Capacity for a large call, where each participant multiplies the load rather than adding to it
If you would rather not build
- A phone call, which connects everywhere and needs no client
The escape hatch
open source · no votes, no paid placement
Jitsi Meet
$0A complete open-source meeting platform you can self-host.
jitsi/jitsi-meetfree · open source
LiveKit
$0An open media server for embedding real-time audio and video in a product.
livekit/livekitfree · open source
Why this verdict
our own opinion · changed only by a person
10/100
Verdict no at 10: the relay capacity and the installed base are both unreproducible, and the second one more than the first. The useful advice here is about seats and meeting count rather than software.
History
tracked since 14 Aug 2026 · nothing is ever overwritten
Questions about Zoom
answered from the record above
Is Zoom free?
No — the plan we track is $15.99 a month. Pro at $15.99 per user per month billed monthly, around $13.33 annually; a free tier covers meetings up to forty minutes.
Can you replace Zoom by building your own?
KEEP IT. The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying. Replacement score 10 out of 100, build time longer than it saves. Read what you lose before you decide.
How much does Zoom cost?
$15.99 a month on Pro — $191.88 a year. Recorded 14 Aug 2026.
What do you lose by replacing Zoom?
Calls that connect on restrictive networks, which is bandwidth and relay servers rather than software; Clients on every platform, including the ones in meeting rooms and on televisions; A link anybody can open without explanation, which is the entire reason it spread; Capacity for a large call, where each participant multiplies the load rather than adding to it. If any of those carry weight for you, keep paying.
Is there an open-source alternative to Zoom?
Yes: Jitsi Meet, LiveKit. The prompt on this page is for when you want it your way instead.
Related entries
same category first, most replaced first
Every week, something stops being worth paying for.
New verdicts, prices that moved, entries added. One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. Nothing is being sent yet — your address is kept here, and the first issue is the first thing it is used for.
free forever · no tracking pixel · stored here, never passed to anyone

