Writing assistance everywhere you type: grammar and spelling corrections, tone and clarity suggestions, delivered through browser extensions and native integrations.
Do not build this. Working inside every text box is the product, and it is a permanent maintenance job. A browser extension that behaves correctly in every editor on the web — rich text, code editors, contenteditable, shadow DOM, an email client that rewrites the DOM under you — is endless work, and the suggestions themselves are trained on a corpus you do not have. WHAT TO DO INSTEAD - Keep it if you write in other people's text boxes all day - **And consider what it sees.** An extension with permission to read every text field is reading your email drafts, your messages and anything you type into an internal tool. That is a real consideration for work, and some employers forbid it for exactly that reason WHAT YOU CAN BUILD, AND SHOULD **Your own style checker**, which is better than any general one for your own writing: - Run the open LanguageTool server in a container for grammar and spelling. Twenty languages of real linguistic work, free, and better than anything you would write - On top of it, a term list: prefer this word, never that one, with a reason. Your product's name capitalised exactly one way, the hedges you overuse, the phrases you have decided against - Rules as a file in a repository, reviewed like code. A style guide nobody can diff is one nobody follows - Run it in CI on every pull request for documentation, and through an editor integration via the language server protocol, which reaches most editors at once - Record which rules fire and get ignored. Delete any rule ignored twice — a rule nobody agrees with trains people to ignore the tool AND THE MEASUREMENTS THAT NEED NO MODEL Sentence length distribution rather than the average, repeated sentence openers, repeated phrases across a document, and passive constructions counted and located. All arithmetic, all more useful than a grammar correction, and all yours. THE ONE-LINE VERSION Keep it for other people's text boxes if you trust it there. Build the term list and run it in CI, because that is the part that actually improves your writing.
What you lose
- Corrections inside every application and text field, which is an integration problem, not a model one
- Suggestions that are right often enough to be trusted without checking each one
- Tone, clarity and consistency guidance beyond grammar
- Enterprise style guides applied across a whole company
- Latency low enough that the suggestion appears while you are still typing
If you would rather not build
- ProWritingAid — paid, stronger long-form reports
What it costs
as published on their pricing page
| Plan | Billed monthly | Billed yearly | Last read |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | $30/mo | — | — |
Their pricing page is where these came from. Seeing a different price? Tell us.
The escape hatch
open source · no votes, no paid placement
LanguageTool
$0Grammar and style checking in many languages, runs entirely on your machine.
languagetool-org/languagetoolfree · open source
Vale
$0Prose linter driven by a style file, made for enforcing a house voice in CI.
vale-cli/valefree · open source
Why this verdict
our own opinion · changed only by a person
30/100
Verdict no at 30: the checking is solvable — LanguageTool is genuinely good and a house-style file beats a model for consistency. The reason it is a no is the integration surface: Grammarly is bought because it works in every text box on the machine.
History
tracked since 9 Aug 2026 · nothing is ever overwritten
Questions about Grammarly
answered from the record above
Is Grammarly free?
No — the plan we track is $30 a month. Pro at $30/month billed monthly, around $12 annually; a free tier covers basic corrections.
Can you replace Grammarly by building your own?
KEEP IT. The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying. Replacement score 30 out of 100, build time longer than it saves. Read what you lose before you decide.
How much does Grammarly cost?
$30 a month on Pro — $360 a year. Recorded 9 Aug 2026.
What do you lose by replacing Grammarly?
Corrections inside every application and text field, which is an integration problem, not a model one; Suggestions that are right often enough to be trusted without checking each one; Tone, clarity and consistency guidance beyond grammar; Enterprise style guides applied across a whole company; Latency low enough that the suggestion appears while you are still typing. If any of those carry weight for you, keep paying.
Is there an open-source alternative to Grammarly?
Yes: LanguageTool, Vale. The prompt on this page is for when you want it your way instead.
Related entries
same category first, most replaced first
Every week, something stops being worth paying for.
New verdicts, prices that moved, entries added. One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. Nothing is being sent yet — your address is kept here, and the first issue is the first thing it is used for.
free forever · no tracking pixel · stored here, never passed to anyone

