Hunter
The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying.
Finds and verifies work email addresses: give it a company domain and it returns the addresses it has seen, with a confidence score and a verification check.
Do not build this — and the reason is only partly that you cannot crawl the web. **In the EU and the UK, a work email address identifying a person is personal data.** Collecting and using one without a lawful basis is not a grey area, and the fact that a product sells the database does not transfer the obligation to them. Building your own scraper for the same purpose puts you squarely on the wrong side of it, with no supplier to point at. WHAT TO DO INSTEAD - Keep paying if you genuinely need it, and check the rules where your prospects live before using what it returns - Better: get the address from the person. A form, a conversation, a conference badge, a reply. An address somebody gave you is worth several that you guessed WHAT YOU CAN BUILD, AND SHOULD **Verification, which is the honest half and is free:** - Syntax, then the domain's MX records, then an SMTP conversation that stops before sending anything - **Catch-all detection matters more than the check itself**: a domain that accepts every address tells you the verification means nothing there, and a large share of company domains are catch-all - Never run this from your sending domain. Repeated verification traffic looks exactly like a directory-harvest attack, and it is a good way to have your own mail blocked - Rate-limit yourself hard, and treat a soft failure as unknown rather than as valid **Pattern inference, which is arithmetic over what you already have:** - From the addresses in your own mailbox and CRM, work out each company's format — first.last, f.last, first — and its confidence - That covers the companies you already deal with, which is usually the list that matters **And the thing that actually reduces bounces:** list hygiene rather than verification. Suppress hard bounces immediately, never import a list you did not build, and watch the complaint rate. That is under Lemlist and Brevo elsewhere in this catalogue. THE ONE-LINE VERSION The database is unbuildable and, in much of Europe, unusable without a basis. Build the verification, infer the patterns from your own mail, and get addresses from people rather than about them.
What you lose
- A crawl of the public web collecting addresses, which is the entire product and cannot be rebuilt
- Verification that keeps a bounce rate low without you burning your own sending reputation testing it
- Pattern inference across millions of companies, so a guess at an address format is usually right
- Somebody else carrying the legal question of holding that database
If you would rather not build
- A verification check of your own, which is a DNS lookup and a careful SMTP conversation
- Your own mailbox, which already holds the addresses of everybody you deal with
- Asking, which is free and legal everywhere
The escape hatch
open source · no votes, no paid placement
check-if-email-exists
$0Open-source email verification with catch-all and disposable detection.
reacherhq/check-if-email-existsfree · open source
Listmonk
$0Handles the list hygiene half — bounces, complaints and suppression.
knadh/listmonkfree · open source
Why this verdict
our own opinion · changed only by a person
22/100
Verdict no at 22: the crawl cannot be rebuilt, and the legal position is the sharper half of the answer. The verification and pattern halves are genuinely buildable and the entry says how.
History
tracked since 14 Aug 2026 · nothing is ever overwritten
Nothing recorded yet. This chart fills in once the page has visitors, votes or prompt copies — it will not draw a flat line to look busy.
Questions about Hunter
answered from the record above
Is Hunter free?
No — the plan we track is $34 a month. Starter at $34/month billed monthly, around $27 annually, for a monthly search and verification quota.
Can you replace Hunter by building your own?
KEEP IT. The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying. Replacement score 22 out of 100, build time longer than it saves. Read what you lose before you decide.
How much does Hunter cost?
$34 a month on Starter — $408 a year. Recorded 14 Aug 2026.
What do you lose by replacing Hunter?
A crawl of the public web collecting addresses, which is the entire product and cannot be rebuilt; Verification that keeps a bounce rate low without you burning your own sending reputation testing it; Pattern inference across millions of companies, so a guess at an address format is usually right; Somebody else carrying the legal question of holding that database. If any of those carry weight for you, keep paying.
Is there an open-source alternative to Hunter?
Yes: check-if-email-exists, Listmonk. The prompt on this page is for when you want it your way instead.
Related entries
same category first, most replaced first
Every week, something stops being worth paying for.
New verdicts, prices that moved, entries added. One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. Nothing is being sent yet — your address is kept here, and the first issue is the first thing it is used for.
free forever · no tracking pixel · stored here, never passed to anyone

