Jira
The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying.
The issue tracker large engineering organisations run on: configurable workflows, permission schemes, custom fields, and reporting that a programme manager reads.
Do not build this if a large organisation runs on it. The lock is not the software — it is that everything points at it. Commit messages, pull requests, documents, support tickets and a decade of links all carry issue keys. Those keys are permanent identifiers scattered across systems you do not control, and a migration either brings them along or breaks all of it. WHEN TO KEEP PAYING - More than a handful of teams, or anybody outside engineering reading the reports - Any regulated context where the audit trail on a change is part of the process WHEN TO LEAVE - **Check the free tier first.** It covers ten users, which is more than a lot of teams paying for it. That one look is worth more than any migration plan - A single team that controls its own tooling. Then the shape is under Linear, Plane and Shortcut elsewhere in this catalogue, and it is a fortnight IF YOU DO MIGRATE, THE ONLY PART THAT MATTERS - **Keep the issue keys.** Import them as the identifier rather than renumbering, or every link anybody has ever written stops resolving - Redirect the old URLs to the new ones and leave the redirect in place indefinitely - Bring the history, not just the current state: who changed what and when is the half that makes an old issue worth anything - Bring attachments and comments, and check the counts. An import that silently dropped four thousand comments is discovered a year later - Export first and read what actually comes out before deciding anything WHAT TO BUILD REGARDLESS **A fixed set of status types under whatever the statuses are called.** Teams want their own names; every report needs to know what a status means. Custom labels, fixed kinds — backlog, unstarted, started, done, cancelled — and every report is written once rather than per project **An append-only history table.** Every field change with the actor and the timestamp. Cycle time, lead time and 'what is stuck' all come from it, and none can be reconstructed later **And the discipline nobody buys:** the workflow with seven states and fourteen transitions exists because somebody could configure it, not because anybody needed it. Whatever you use, a shorter workflow is a better one, and that is free. THE ONE-LINE VERSION Check the free tier. If you leave, keep the issue keys and redirect the old URLs — that is the whole migration risk in one sentence.
What you lose
- Workflows and permission schemes configurable to whatever a large organisation has agreed, which is why it is chosen
- Integration with everything else already in use, and the years of links pointing at issue keys
- Reporting that people outside engineering already know how to read
- Migration of a decade of issues, which is the real cost of leaving rather than the licence
If you would rather not build
- The free tier, which covers ten users and is often enough
- A shorter workflow, which costs nothing and helps more than a migration
The escape hatch
open source · no votes, no paid placement
Plane
$0Open-source issues, cycles and modules with a self-hosted edition.
makeplane/planefree · open source
Redmine
$0A long-standing self-hosted tracker with workflows and custom fields.
redmine/redminefree · open source
Why this verdict
our own opinion · changed only by a person
21/100
Verdict no at 21: the tracker is buildable and the lock is everything pointing at it. The advice that matters is the free tier and, if leaving, keeping the issue keys.
History
tracked since 14 Aug 2026 · nothing is ever overwritten
Nothing recorded yet. This chart fills in once the page has visitors, votes or prompt copies — it will not draw a flat line to look busy.
Questions about Jira
answered from the record above
Is Jira free?
No — the plan we track is $7.53 a month. Standard at $7.53 per user per month billed monthly, cheaper annually; a free tier covers up to ten users.
Can you replace Jira by building your own?
KEEP IT. The value is the network, the data or the infrastructure. Keep paying. Replacement score 21 out of 100, build time longer than it saves. Read what you lose before you decide.
How much does Jira cost?
$7.53 a month on Standard — $90.36 a year. Recorded 14 Aug 2026.
What do you lose by replacing Jira?
Workflows and permission schemes configurable to whatever a large organisation has agreed, which is why it is chosen; Integration with everything else already in use, and the years of links pointing at issue keys; Reporting that people outside engineering already know how to read; Migration of a decade of issues, which is the real cost of leaving rather than the licence. If any of those carry weight for you, keep paying.
Is there an open-source alternative to Jira?
Yes: Plane, Redmine. The prompt on this page is for when you want it your way instead.
Related entries
same category first, most replaced first
Every week, something stops being worth paying for.
New verdicts, prices that moved, entries added. One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click. Nothing is being sent yet — your address is kept here, and the first issue is the first thing it is used for.
free forever · no tracking pixel · stored here, never passed to anyone

